Quentin Halys: Clay specialist edge (59.4%) vs Indoors at 23.5%

Quentin Halys ranks #48 in the ATP (October 2026 snapshot) and has played 134 ATP main-draw matches in our database from 2022–2026. The headline number — 43.3% overall win rate — frames a clear mid-tier profile, but the 54.8% mark in 2026 (42 matches) shows a live uptick. The paradox worth betting on: Clay specialist edge (59.4%) vs Indoors at 23.5%.
Key metrics at a glance
| Metric | Value |
|---|---|
| Overall win rate | 43.3% |
| ATP rank (snapshot) | 48 |
| Matches analysed | 134 (2022–2026) |
| Best surface | Clay — 59.4% |
| Weakest surface | Indoors — 23.5% |
| Grand Slam win rate | 43.8% (14–18) |
| As favourite | 64.7% (n=34) |
| As underdog | 33.3% (n=57) |
Halys's year-by-year record
| Year | Matches | Wins | Win rate |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | 14 | 3 | 21.4% |
| 2023 | 28 | 12 | 42.9% |
| 2024 | 14 | 8 | 57.1% |
| 2025 | 36 | 12 | 33.3% |
| 2026 | 42 | 23 | 54.8% |

Win rate by season, Quentin Halys, 2022–2026. Source: ATP match data via tennispredictor.net
Year-to-year movement shows where the market should update fastest. The Clay edge vs Indoors floor and the year table are the primary form anchors for live pricing — not a single career average.
Surface breakdown: where the edge lives
| Surface | Matches | Win rate |
|---|---|---|
| Hard | 62 | 40.3% |
| Clay | 32 | 59.4% |
| Grass | 23 | 43.5% |
| Indoors | 17 | 23.5% |

Win rate by surface, Quentin Halys, 2022–2026. Source: ATP match data via tennispredictor.net
Surface is the first filter before round or opponent quality. Compare clay baselines in the clay-court betting guide and grass patterns in the grass-court specificity guide when translating these rates into match previews.
Tournament tier: reliability by event level
| Tournament level | Matches | Win rate |
|---|---|---|
| ATP 250 | 31 | 48.4% |
| Masters 1000 | 26 | 46.2% |
| Grand Slam | 32 | 43.8% |
| ATP 500 | 45 | 37.8% |

Win rate by tournament tier, Quentin Halys, 2022–2026. Source: ATP match data via tennispredictor.net
Grand Slam and Masters samples matter most for pricing; ATP 250/500 volume often inflates or deflates the headline win rate. Cross-check against Ugo Humbert or Arthur Rinderknech for other ranks-21–50 archetypes.
Round-by-round: early rounds vs deep runs
| Round | Matches | Win rate |
|---|---|---|
| R1 | 74 | 48.6% |
| R2 | 20 | 35.0% |
| R3 | 7 | 28.6% |
| R16 | 21 | 33.3% |
| QF | 7 | 42.9% |
| SF | 3 | 66.7% |
| F | 2 | 50.0% |

Win rate by round, Quentin Halys, 2022–2026. Source: ATP match data via tennispredictor.net
Round curves separate true closers from early-round specialists. Use the drop from early rounds into deeper stages as a fade signal even when the overall win rate looks acceptable — the same structural idea as Rublev's late-round ceiling.
H2H against elite rivals
| Rival | W–L | Win rate |
|---|---|---|
| Zverev | 0–4 | 0.0% |
| Basilashvili | 0–3 | 0.0% |
| Popyrin | 3–0 | 100.0% |
| Bonzi | 1–2 | 33.3% |
| Medvedev | 0–3 | 0.0% |
Elite H2H is sparse for many mid-ranked players; only rows with multiple meetings are shown. Use these as matchup modifiers, not as a substitute for surface form.
Favourite vs underdog split
| Role | Matches | Win rate |
|---|---|---|
| Favourite | 34 | 64.7% |
| Underdog | 57 | 33.3% |

Favourite vs underdog win rate, Quentin Halys, 2022–2026. Source: ATP match odds via tennispredictor.net
What the betting market misses about Quentin Halys
Back Quentin Halys when:
- on clay (59.4% over 32 matches)
- when priced as favourite (64.7% conversion, n=34)
- in first-round spots (48.6% over 74 matches)
- during strong 2026 form (54.8% over 42 matches)
Fade Quentin Halys when:
- on indoors (23.5%)
- in R16 or later (33.3% at R16)
- against top-tier opponents with repeated negative H2H (e.g. Zverev 0–4)
For live slate context, open the predictions dashboard rather than relying on a static profile alone.
How our model treats Quentin Halys
The ensemble weights surface win-rate history, recent form (last 5 / last 10), and tournament-tier context most heavily for a rank-21–50 profile like this. Favourite/underdog conversion is a secondary prior when odds history is dense enough (here: 91 matches with usable prices). Uncertainty rises when the next match is on indoors or in a deep-draw round where Halys's historical conversion collapses.
Frequently asked questions
What is Quentin Halys's overall win rate in this study?
43.3% across 134 ATP main-draw matches from 2022–2026.
Which surface shows the highest win rate?
Clay at 59.4% (32 matches).
How often does Quentin Halys win when installed as favourite?
64.7% over 34 favourite-priced matches in the cache (usable odds only).
How does Quentin Halys perform at Grand Slams vs regular events?
Grand Slam win rate is 43.8% (14–18), versus 43.3% overall.
Who is Quentin Halys's toughest matchup in the data?
Among repeated elite meetings: Zverev (0–4).
When is Quentin Halys worth backing or fading based on this data?
Back when on clay (59.4% over 32 matches) / when priced as favourite (64.7% conversion, n=34) / in first-round spots (48.6% over 74 matches). Fade when on indoors (23.5%) / in R16 or later (33.3% at R16).
How reliable are these statistics given the sample size?
134 matches is a standard profile sample; surface and favourite splits with n≥15 are the most trustworthy rows.
How does your model handle Quentin Halys's surface and form swings?
It re-weights recent surface form and does not treat the career overall win rate as a constant prior when the year-by-year table shows large swings (notably the 2026 line at 54.8%).
Conclusion
Quentin Halys at ATP #48 is a ranks-21–50 profile defined by 43.3% overall and Clay specialist edge (59.4%) vs Indoors at 23.5%. The actionable reads are the surface table, the favourite conversion, the 2026 form line, and the round curve — not the ranking alone.
Watch the North American hard-court swing and any surface-specific weeks to confirm whether current form holds. For related mid-tier profiles, see Luca Van Assche and Adrian Mannarino.
See today's match predictions with confidence scores and value signals.
View Live Predictionsarrow_forwardRelated Articles

Luca Van Assche: Clay specialist edge (51.6%) vs Indoors at 14.3%
Luca Van Assche has played 65 ATP main-draw matches from 2022–2026 at a 38.5% overall win rate. The data story: Clay specialist edge (51.6%) vs Indoors at 14.3%.
October 17, 2026 · 11 min read

Botic van de Zandschulp: reliable favourite conversion at 66.7%
Botic van de Zandschulp has played 206 ATP main-draw matches from 2022–2026 at a 49.0% overall win rate. The data story: reliable favourite conversion at 66.7%.
October 17, 2026 · 11 min read

Carlos Alcaraz ATP analysis: predicting the unpredictable
Carlos Alcaraz has played 298 ATP main-draw matches from 2022–2026 at a 85.9% win rate. Data story: elite win rate with real favourite-upset risk that markets compress.
September 8, 2026 · 14 min read

Alex de Minaur ATP analysis: top-20 profile and betting read
Alex de Minaur has played 299 ATP main-draw matches from 2022–2026 at a 67.6% win rate. Data story: favourite conversion at 76.2% (23.8% upset risk).
September 8, 2026 · 12 min read