Jakub Mensik ATP analysis: top-20 profile and betting read

Jakub Mensik ranks #15 in the ATP (rankings snapshot 2026-10) and has played 138 ATP main-draw matches in our database from 2022–2026 (tournament cache through 2026-09-08). The headline number — 64.5% overall win rate — frames a clear top-20 profile, with 69.2% across 52 matches in 2026 (an uptick vs career). The paradox worth pricing: favourite conversion at 80.6% (19.4% upset risk).
Key metrics at a glance
| Metric | Value |
|---|---|
| Overall win rate | 64.5% |
| ATP rank (snapshot) | 15 |
| Matches analysed | 138 (2022–2026) |
| Best surface | Hard — 67.5% |
| Weakest surface | Grass — 46.7% |
| Grand Slam win rate | 64.7% (22–12) |
| As favourite | 80.6% (n=36) |
| As underdog | 47.2% (n=53) |
Mensik's year-by-year record
| Year | Matches | Wins | Win rate |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | 3 | 2 | 66.7% |
| 2024 | 33 | 20 | 60.6% |
| 2025 | 50 | 31 | 62.0% |
| 2026 | 52 | 36 | 69.2% |

Win rate by season, Jakub Mensik, 2022–2026. Source: ATP match data via tennispredictor.net
Year-to-year movement shows where the market should update fastest. The favourite conversion at 80.6% and the year table are the primary form anchors for live pricing — not a single career average.
Surface breakdown: where the edge lives
| Surface | Matches | Win rate |
|---|---|---|
| Hard | 83 | 67.5% |
| Clay | 36 | 66.7% |
| Grass | 15 | 46.7% |
| Indoors | 4 | 50.0% |

Win rate by surface, Jakub Mensik, 2022–2026. Source: ATP match data via tennispredictor.net
Surface is the first filter before round or opponent quality. Compare clay baselines in the clay-court betting guide and grass patterns in the grass-court specificity guide when translating these rates into match previews.
Tournament tier: reliability by event level
| Tournament level | Matches | Win rate |
|---|---|---|
| ATP 250 | 20 | 75.0% |
| Masters 1000 | 47 | 66.0% |
| Grand Slam | 34 | 64.7% |
| ATP 500 | 37 | 56.8% |

Win rate by tournament tier, Jakub Mensik, 2022–2026. Source: ATP match data via tennispredictor.net
Grand Slam and Masters samples matter most for pricing top-20 players; ATP 250/500 volume can inflate or deflate the headline win rate. Cross-check against Rafael Jodar or Jiri Lehecka for peer archetypes.
Round-by-round: early rounds vs deep runs
| Round | Matches | Win rate |
|---|---|---|
| R1 | 38 | 81.6% |
| R2 | 28 | 71.4% |
| R3 | 20 | 50.0% |
| R16 | 26 | 61.5% |
| QF | 16 | 43.8% |
| SF | 7 | 42.9% |
| F | 3 | 66.7% |

Win rate by round, Jakub Mensik, 2022–2026. Source: ATP match data via tennispredictor.net
Round curves separate true closers from early-round specialists. Use the drop from early rounds into deeper stages as a fade signal even when the overall win rate looks elite — the same structural idea as Rublev's late-round ceiling.
H2H against elite rivals
| Rival | W–L | Win rate |
|---|---|---|
| Davidovich Fokina | 1–5 | 16.7% |
| Rublev | 4–0 | 100.0% |
| Shelton | 2–2 | 50.0% |
| De Minaur | 2–2 | 50.0% |
| Droguet | 3–0 | 100.0% |
Elite H2H is the matchup modifier on top of surface form. Prefer rows with multiple meetings; single-sample rivalries are noise.
Favourite vs underdog split
| Role | Matches | Win rate |
|---|---|---|
| Favourite | 36 | 80.6% |
| Underdog | 53 | 47.2% |

Favourite vs underdog win rate, Jakub Mensik, 2022–2026. Source: ATP match odds via tennispredictor.net
What the betting market misses about Jakub Mensik
Back Jakub Mensik when:
- on hard (67.5% over 83 matches)
- when priced as favourite (80.6% conversion, n=36)
- during strong 2026 form (69.2% over 52 matches)
Fade Jakub Mensik when:
- on grass (46.7%)
- in QF or later (43.8% at QF)
- against repeated negative H2H (e.g. Davidovich Fokina 1–5)
For live slate context, open the predictions dashboard rather than relying on a static profile alone.
How our model treats Jakub Mensik
The ensemble weights surface win-rate history, recent form (last 5 / last 10), and tournament-tier context most heavily for a top-20 profile like this. Favourite/underdog conversion is a strong secondary prior when odds history is dense (here: 89 matches with usable prices). Uncertainty rises when the next match is on grass or in a deep-draw round where Mensik's historical conversion collapses.
Frequently asked questions
What is Jakub Mensik's overall win rate in this study?
64.5% across 138 ATP main-draw matches from 2022–2026.
Which surface shows the highest win rate?
Hard at 67.5% (83 matches).
How often does Jakub Mensik win when installed as favourite?
80.6% over 36 favourite-priced matches in the cache (usable odds only).
How does Jakub Mensik perform at Grand Slams vs regular events?
Grand Slam win rate is 64.7% (22–12), versus 64.5% overall.
Who is Jakub Mensik's toughest matchup in the data?
Among repeated meetings: Davidovich Fokina (1–5).
When is Jakub Mensik worth backing or fading based on this data?
Back when on hard (67.5% over 83 matches) / when priced as favourite (80.6% conversion, n=36) / during strong 2026 form (69.2% over 52 matches). Fade when on grass (46.7%) / in QF or later (43.8% at QF).
How reliable are these statistics given the sample size?
138 matches is a solid top-20 sample; surface and favourite splits with n≥15 are the most trustworthy rows. Cache through 2026-09-08.
How does your model handle Jakub Mensik's surface and form swings?
It re-weights recent surface form and does not treat the career overall win rate as a constant prior when the year-by-year table shows large swings (notably the 2026 line at 69.2%).
Conclusion
Jakub Mensik at ATP #15 is a top-20 profile defined by 64.5% overall and favourite conversion at 80.6% (19.4% upset risk). The actionable reads are the surface table, the favourite conversion, the 2026 form line, and the round curve — not the ranking alone.
Watch hard-court swings and any surface-specific weeks to confirm whether current form holds. For related profiles, see Rafael Jodar and Jiri Lehecka.
See today's match predictions with confidence scores and value signals.
View Live Predictionsarrow_forwardRelated Articles

Quentin Halys: Clay specialist edge (59.4%) vs Indoors at 23.5%
Quentin Halys has played 134 ATP main-draw matches from 2022–2026 at a 43.3% overall win rate. The data story: Clay specialist edge (59.4%) vs Indoors at 23.5%.
October 17, 2026 · 11 min read

Luca Van Assche: Clay specialist edge (51.6%) vs Indoors at 14.3%
Luca Van Assche has played 65 ATP main-draw matches from 2022–2026 at a 38.5% overall win rate. The data story: Clay specialist edge (51.6%) vs Indoors at 14.3%.
October 17, 2026 · 11 min read

Botic van de Zandschulp: reliable favourite conversion at 66.7%
Botic van de Zandschulp has played 206 ATP main-draw matches from 2022–2026 at a 49.0% overall win rate. The data story: reliable favourite conversion at 66.7%.
October 17, 2026 · 11 min read

Carlos Alcaraz ATP analysis: predicting the unpredictable
Carlos Alcaraz has played 298 ATP main-draw matches from 2022–2026 at a 85.9% win rate. Data story: elite win rate with real favourite-upset risk that markets compress.
September 8, 2026 · 14 min read