arrow_backBack to Blog
Player Profiles

Jan-Lennard Struff: Clay specialist edge (59.1%) vs Hard at 25.0%

personAnalytics Team·calendar_todayJuly 19, 2026·schedule14 min read
Jan-Lennard Struff 47.2% win rate — 59.1% Clay WR, 67.4% As favourite, 43.5% Grand Slam WR — tennispredictor.net

Jan-Lennard Struff ranks 41 in the ATP (July 2026 snapshot) and has played 125 ATP main-draw matches in our database from 2022 to 2026. The headline number — 47.2% overall win rate — frames a clear mid-tier profile. The paradox worth betting on: Clay specialist edge (59.1%) vs Hard at 25.0%.

Key metrics at a glance

Metric Value
Overall win rate 47.2%
ATP rank (snapshot) 41
Matches analysed 125 (2022–2026)
Best surface Clay — 59.1%
Weakest surface Hard — 25.0%
Grand Slam win rate 43.5% (10–13)
As favourite 67.4% (n=43)
As underdog 40.7% (n=59)

Struff's year-by-year record

Year Matches Wins Win rate
2022 13 3 23.1%
2023 28 16 57.1%
2024 42 25 59.5%
2025 35 14 40.0%
2026 7 1 14.3%

Jan-Lennard Struff year-by-year win rate

Win rate by season, Jan-Lennard Struff, 2022–2026. Source: ATP match data via tennispredictor.net

Year-to-year movement shows where the market should update fastest. Peak and trough seasons above are the primary form anchors for live pricing — not a single career average.

Surface breakdown: where the edge lives

Surface Matches Win rate
Clay 44 59.1%
Grass 26 57.7%
Indoors 15 53.3%
Hard 40 25.0%

Jan-Lennard Struff win rate by surface

Win rate by surface, Jan-Lennard Struff, 2022–2026. Source: ATP match data via tennispredictor.net

Surface is the first filter before round or opponent quality. Compare clay baselines in the clay-court betting guide and grass patterns in the grass-court specificity guide when translating these rates into match previews.

Tournament tier: reliability by event level

Tournament level Matches Win rate
Grand Slam 23 43.5%
Masters 1000 39 48.7%
ATP 500 18 27.8%
ATP 250 45 55.6%

Jan-Lennard Struff win rate by tournament tier

Win rate by tournament tier, Jan-Lennard Struff, 2022–2026. Source: ATP match data via tennispredictor.net

Grand Slam and Masters samples matter most for pricing; ATP 250/500 volume often inflates or deflates the headline win rate. Cross-check against Tommy Paul or Francisco Cerundolo for other ranks-21–50 archetypes.

Round-by-round: early rounds vs deep runs

Round Matches Win rate
1R 83 45.8%
2R 16 62.5%
3R 8 37.5%
QF 11 36.4%
SF 4 75.0%
F 3 33.3%

Jan-Lennard Struff win rate by round

Win rate by round, Jan-Lennard Struff, 2022–2026. Source: ATP match data via tennispredictor.net

Round curves separate true closers from early-round specialists. A drop at QF/SF is a fade signal even when the overall win rate looks healthy — the same structural idea as Rublev's late-round ceiling.

H2H against elite rivals

Rival W–L Win rate
Tsitsipas 2–3 40.0%
Alcaraz 0–4 0.0%
De Minaur 1–2 33.3%
Sinner 0–3 0.0%
Medvedev 0–3 0.0%
Ruud 1–1 50.0%
Rune 2–0 100.0%

Elite H2H is sparse for many mid-ranked players; only rows with multiple meetings are shown. Use these as matchup modifiers, not as a substitute for surface form.

Favourite vs underdog split

Role Matches Win rate
Favourite 43 67.4%
Underdog 59 40.7%

Jan-Lennard Struff favourite vs underdog

Favourite vs underdog win rate, Jan-Lennard Struff, 2022–2026. Source: ATP match odds via tennispredictor.net

What the betting market misses about Jan-Lennard Struff

Back Jan-Lennard Struff when:

  • on clay (59.1% over 44 matches)
  • when priced as favourite (67.4% conversion, n=43)

Fade Jan-Lennard Struff when:

  • on hard (25.0%)

For live slate context, open the predictions dashboard rather than relying on a static profile alone.

How our model treats Jan-Lennard Struff

The ensemble weights surface win-rate history, recent form (last 5 / last 10), and tournament-tier context most heavily for a rank-21–50 profile like this. Favourite/underdog conversion is a secondary prior when odds history is dense enough (here: 102 matches with usable prices). Uncertainty rises when the next match is on a thin-sample surface or against an elite rival with a one-sided H2H.

Frequently asked questions

What is Jan-Lennard Struff's overall win rate in this study?

47.2% across 125 ATP main-draw matches from 2022 to 2026.

Which surface shows the highest win rate?

Clay at 59.1% (44 matches).

How often does Jan-Lennard Struff win when installed as favourite?

67.4% over 43 favourite-priced matches in the cache (usable odds only).

How does Jan-Lennard Struff perform at Grand Slams vs regular events?

Grand Slam win rate is 43.5% (10–13), versus 47.2% overall.

Who is Jan-Lennard Struff's toughest matchup in the data?

Among repeated elite meetings: Alcaraz (0–4).

When is Jan-Lennard Struff worth backing or fading based on this data?

Back when on clay (59.1% over 44 matches) / when priced as favourite (67.4% conversion, n=43). Fade when on hard (25.0%).

How reliable are these statistics given the sample size?

125 matches is a standard profile sample; surface and favourite splits with n≥15 are the most trustworthy rows.

How does your model handle Jan-Lennard Struff's surface and form swings?

It re-weights recent surface form and does not treat the career overall win rate as a constant prior when the year-by-year table shows large swings.

Conclusion

Jan-Lennard Struff at ATP #41 is a ranks-21–50 profile defined by 47.2% overall and Clay specialist edge (59.1%) vs Hard at 25.0%. The actionable reads are the surface table, the favourite conversion (67.4%), and the round curve — not the ranking alone.

Watch the next clay/hard swing and any deep-run weeks to confirm whether the 2022–2026 pattern still holds into the second half of 2026. For related mid-tier profiles, see Vacherot and Collignon.

See today's match predictions with confidence scores and value signals.

View Live Predictionsarrow_forward

Related Articles

cookieThis site uses cookies (Google Analytics) to improve your experience. By using this site, you consent to our use of cookies. Privacy Policy